My height is 160, and I’ve experienced both – the latter was way better, so it’s defo the latter for me.


1. [+304][-6] Are you serious….? Have you not seen someone who’s 35kg before? Even if you’re 53, you can still be slim.

2. [+171][-11] 53 is really a normal body weight – not slim, not chubby.

3. [+168][-3] If it’s mostly muscles, then 53 for sure. But even if that’s not the case, 35 is just too fxxking much.

4. [+86][-1] Are you pro-anorexia? Fxxking please. 35kg, what even? Are you out of your mind?

5. [+62][-1] Isn’t 35kg basically malnutritious..? I’m 160 and when I was 44kg, I kept on getting told that I’m skinny.. Seems like people nowadays really like skinny people.

6. [+45][-0] Isn’t 35kg the weight of a primary kid?

7. [+44][-3] People going for 35 are really crazy. You should go to a mental hospital and receive consulting.

8. [+27][-1] Guys, if you’re 35kg, you really only have bones and skin left ㅜㅜ

9. [+26][-0] Having in mind 35kg is shocking in itself. Stop showing it this way, please ke

10. [+24][-0] You should at least make this 63 vs 36. 53 is just slim ㅡㅡ

11. [+16][-2] If you’re 35 you have a disease -_-